Bloomberg the big hack retraction. What the heck does Bloomberg News mean with 'Markets wrap'?

Bloomberg the big hack retraction Rating: 9,5/10 673 reviews

iTech

bloomberg the big hack retraction

It is a community that allows the exchange of information, supports the ongoing discussion of media ethics, and protects the right of the individual to embrace their personal interests in entertainment and fandom. There is something strange here. Bringing the international community to the table could put pressure on China and other nations with similar aspirations while legitimizing any unilateral actions the United States chooses to take. There was almost certainly a small army of editors, executives, and committees that vetted the article before it was made the cover story of Bloomberg Businessweek. Small chips were allegedly implanted into server motherboards, allowing China to access corporate secrets and other information. Supermicro, like Apple and other companies involved, has denied all of Bloomberg's claims since the story was first released.

Next

Bloomberg is Still Reporting on Challenged Story Regarding China Hardware Hack

bloomberg the big hack retraction

Apple's aggressive campaign to deny the report extends to. For Tim to call for a retraction suggests the article must have hit on a core value of the company. First and foremost, the federal government cannot afford to use motherboards, or other hardware, which is produced or manufactured outside the United States. From a signals perspective, there's also the minor detail that it's effectively impossible to sniff any Ethernet signals from inside the jack, on any modern device. The problem is that there is also no physical evidence - at all. Supermicro would contract for those boards. That distinction went to work from HuffPost, National Geographic, New York Times Magazine, New Yorker and ProPublica.

Next

What the heck does Bloomberg News mean with 'Markets wrap'?

bloomberg the big hack retraction

We really forensically whipped through the company to dig very deep and each time we came back to the same conclusion: This did not happen. Our seasoned contributors and authors provide and curate stories across the social media for vast readers across the web. What, if anything, strained credulity? As is typical with most of these audits, it offered some recommended areas to remediate, and we fixed all critical issues before the acquisition closed. One of the named sources in the story says the reporters presented his hypotheticals as if they were actually happening. In the real world, some Huawei laptops were just found to have a hardware vulnerability due to how they were produced, which could in theory have been accidental, but was quite likely deliberate. Government officials denied any knowledge of the investigations described in the article.

Next

Bloomberg spy chip: The story that will not die

bloomberg the big hack retraction

They claimed that nearly 10,000 Super Micro boards were affected at Apple, but the most Super Micro boards ever in Apple's possession was nearly an order of magnitude fewer than that. But it was surprising to me that in a scenario where I would describe these things and then he would go and confirm these and 100 percent of what I described was confirmed by sources. What would they gain vs what would they lose if they were to confirm these rumors. There is no reason to think that any administration especially this one could carry that off without a leak, no matter what was at stake. This is getting a little bit weird.

Next

Opinions and Analysis: The Big Hack: Updating National Security for the 21st Century

bloomberg the big hack retraction

Apple Boardroom: Chair: This Bloomberg report, what do we make of it? Hacking over the internet is well known. Meanwhile, takes a deep breath: Public company, short the stocks, spread a story—voila! Apple is more than happy to sue journalists. They would only base a story on indisputable evidence. However, the claims made in the article start to fall down with the main picture, showing the supposed device they retrieved. What did the sources say and why did they say it? We've covered Bloomberg Businessweek's report in extensive detail over the past week, with all of our coverage available in our. As time goes on, it seems more likely that something is wrong with the story. Meanwhile, the rest of the security community began to express doubts in terms of the technical feasibility of what was reported.

Next

iTech

bloomberg the big hack retraction

Duncan Riley drives in this summary— : The three major companies named in a Bloomberg report that claimed that their hardware had been infected with tiny … spy chips are calling on the news service to retract the story. The attack ultimately reached almost 30 companies, Bloomberg claims. Department of Homeland Security, mentioned in the story. We hold ourselves to be politically neutral ground, not forcing anyone to conform in their opinions, and permitting a wide variety of viewpoints to express themselves in a civil manner. Every little detail can be plausible, but the overall story is improbable. Readers without a technical background may be wondering what it all means.

Next

The Big Hack Archives

bloomberg the big hack retraction

Even former White House Cyber Coordinator cast doubt on it publicly. We have observed numerous incidents involving conflicts of interest and agenda-pushing within media which we feel are damaging to the credibility of the medium and harm the community at large. And that is the lynchpin of this entire matter. If it were not, hard evidence would have surfaced by now. Apple and Amazon both vehemently deny the report.

Next

Bloomberg is Still Reporting on Challenged Story Regarding China Hardware Hack

bloomberg the big hack retraction

We were very clear with them that this did not happen, and answered all their questions. We expect Bloomberg to continue taking a beating from the government, tech giants, and the press, for the sake of protecting the identity of its sources. In addition to the three Apple insiders, four of the six U. Bloomberg should act responsibly and retract its unsupported allegations that malicious hardware components were implanted on our motherboards during the manufacturing process. That Bloomberg refuses to stand down is a pretty serious statement from that news organization. The question is, what, exactly? A Cold Winter Reports of espionage will undoubtedly freeze relations between the United States and China even further than they and could lead to an era marked by distrust and Machiavellian gamesmanship. It found nothing to corroborate the claims in the Bloomberg story, according to Ziatek.

Next

iTech

bloomberg the big hack retraction

Regarding Apple: Apple was an important Supermicro customer and had planned to order more than 30,000 of its servers in two years for a new global network of data centers. What if the article accurately reflects the story told to the reporters by their sources? It is my opinion only and I would be happy to receive criticism. Joe Fitzpatrick is the technical expert named in the Bloomberg article. Or they don't, but they're worried somebody will leak that they don't, so they leaked a fake story that they did. To really understand all the details, you should read the original article. For the government to keep a lid on this story, it would have to execute a flawless cover-up, obtaining or compelling the silence of the leaders of the largest companies in the world as well as engineers and security officials throughout the government and multiple private companies. By implementing a policy consisting of economic incentives tied to performance measures while also communicating an unwillingness to purchase foreign hardware, the government can spur industry giants to relocate manufacturing sites within the United States.

Next